On the last episode of reality ...
"Guiding Light," a mainstay of CBS' daytime schedule for decades, airs its final episode Friday.
Jon left Kate
and his eight children and took up with the party girl Hailey. Audrina
got a restraining order against an alleged stalker. NeNe got into an
argument with Kim during a photo shoot. And Rachel was attacked -- yet
again -- by one of the city tabloids.
With plot points like this, who needs soap operas?
Certainly not most of America. In the past decade, the audience for
soap operas has dwindled, as has the number of what broadcasters call
"daytime dramas." Younger viewers, in particular, have gravitated
toward reality shows, which feature the melodrama and outsized
characters of soaps; it's perhaps no coincidence that the co-creator of
MTV's "The Real World" and several other reality shows, Mary-Ellis
Bunim, started as a soap writer and producer.
The latest soap
victim, CBS' "Guiding Light" -- a show that began on NBC Radio in 1937
-- will go quietly out Friday after 72 years on the air.
Fans lament the passing of the show, which has followed the Springfield
clans of the Bauers, Spauldings, Coopers and Lewises for decades.
"I've been watching 'Guiding Light' for the past 20 years," says Ashley
Dos Santos, an account executive and pop culture expert with the
Washington-based public relations firm Crosby-Volmer. "I think it's
really, really sad."
But, as a (well) realist, she adds, "not surprising." She knows the
trends, and the trend for soap operas is going in the wrong direction.
"It's very difficult to see how it could have survived," she says,
noting that even she's ceased to follow "GL" in the past few years.
With the multichannel universe, particularly the alternatives of talk
shows, judge shows and reality shows, "I feel that a lot people, if
they have to make a choice, they'd rather see 'Ellen.' "
Michael
Sands, a Southern California-based media consultant, is blunter. "Soaps
are passe ... old-fashioned," he says. "They're boring and stale. The
public thrives on real-life drama. I'm surprised soaps lasted this
long."
Not so long ago, such a dismissal would have been
unfathomable. In the three-network arrangement that dominated for
decades, soaps ruled daytime -- there were 19 in 1970 -- and even
spawned prime-time variations, such as "Peyton Place" and "Dallas."
"The 1960s and '70s were an unmatched era for soaps, with women at home
and just three or four [network] choices," says Sam Ford, an analyst
with the communications firm Peppercom. He has a book on the genre due
out next year.
Soaps developed a formula: slow-moving, multiple
plotlines; multigenerational casts, gathered in seaside towns or local
hospitals. Some even broke ground, airing taboo subjects -- abortions,
homosexuality, marital rape -- before prime-time shows.
But
events have conspired to kill off daytime dramas. With more women in
the workplace, there are fewer at home to watch the soaps. The genre
was slow to adjust to new technologies; even now, with the SoapNet
cable channel and Internet streaming, effective promotion is lacking,
says Dos Santos, who observes that soaps fly under the radar compared
to reality shows. "The networks aren't trying hard enough to make
[soaps] relevant," she says.
There's also the loss of family
watching, a handoff from mother to daughter to granddaughter, that used
to assure a continuity of viewers. Dos Santos watched with her mother;
Ford's mother and grandmother were fans.
But the fall-off in soaps tends to boil down to two limited resources: time and money.
"We don't have the time to invest in soaps as they exist now," says
Mimi Torchin, a TV columnist and the founding editor of Soap Opera
Weekly. "Even with alternatives to TV viewing ... it's still five hours
a week. In the old days, you could miss two or three days and it was
easy to catch up. They don't do that anymore."
Moreover, a soap
opera is a big investment, like any scripted show. Bob Boden, now the
vice president of programming for the Fox Reality Channel, was at CBS'
daytime division in the '80s and '90s.
"The decline of the soap
opera as is much a factor of the business model as it is of the
creative," he says. "It was designed to be 52 weeks a year of original
product, no repeats. In today's business model for network television,
that's not an efficient model anymore."
To begin a soap, a
producer has to put together performers, a writing staff, a bible of
characters and plots -- and has to plan things out for months or years,
as opposed to a handful of weeks. "That's not really the mentality of
network programming anymore," Boden says. "I think a lot of it is about
quick fixes, and about maintaining an ever-shrinking audience, and
giving them something unique, and attracting a younger demo[graphic]."
Read the rest of the Story